Forfeiture of Commercial Leases by the Landlord 

Forfeiture is one of the most powerful remedies available to a landlord under a commercial lease. It allows the landlord to terminate the lease and recover possession of the premises when the tenant breaches its obligations. However, as it brings the lease to an end, often with serious financial consequences, courts regulate forfeiture strictly, and landlords must follow precise legal procedures. 

It is also important to consider the financial aspects of forfeiture for the landlord. Whilst the tenant may be in rent arrears, or the premises may be falling into disrepair, terminating the lease means that the property becomes vacant, the landlord becomes liable for ongoing expenses, and it may be a while before a new tenant is secured and rental income returns. It is always worth attempting to negotiate a solution with the existing tenant and use the forfeiture procedure as a last resort when all else has failed.  

This article explains what forfeiture is, when it can be exercised, the procedure involved, and the tenant’s right to relief. 

Forfeiture 

Forfeiture is the landlord’s right to terminate a lease before its contractual expiry date due to a tenant’s breach of covenant. Once validly exercised, the lease ends and the landlord can regain possession. 

The right to forfeit must be expressly set out in the lease, usually through a forfeiture clause (sometimes called a “re-entry clause”). Without such a clause, the landlord generally cannot terminate early for breach, except in limited statutory circumstances. 

Common Grounds for Forfeiture 

A landlord may forfeit a commercial lease for various breaches, including: 

Non-payment of Rent 

This is the most common ground. Most commercial leases allow forfeiture if rent remains unpaid for a specified number of days after it becomes due (often 14 or 21 days), whether formally demanded or not. 

Breach of Other Covenants 

Examples include: 

• Unauthorised alterations 

• Unlawful subletting or assignment 

• Failure to repair 

• Illegal or improper use of the premises 

Insolvency of the Tenant 

Leases often allow forfeiture if the tenant enters liquidation, administration, or bankruptcy. 

Procedure for Forfeiture 

The procedure depends on the nature of the breach. 

For Non-Payment of Rent 

In many jurisdictions (including under English law), the landlord can: 

• Peaceably re-enter the premises (if it can be done without committing a breach of the peace), or 

• Issue court proceedings for possession. 

No prior notice is generally required for rent arrears unless the lease specifies otherwise. 

However, landlords must act carefully. Peaceable re-entry must be lawful—typically carried out when the premises are empty and without force. If there are people present at the property at the time of re-entry, or if any resistance is given to the re-entry then the landlord must desist and procure a court order. Failure to desist under these circumstances may leave the landlord open to being guilty of breaching Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 by using force and possibly Section 2 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 if there is any residential element.  

For Breach of Other Covenants 

For breaches other than rent, landlords must usually serve a statutory notice before forfeiture. 

In England and Wales, this is governed by Section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925. A valid Section 146 notice must: 

1. Specify the breach. 

1. Require the tenant to remedy the breach (if capable of remedy). 

1. Require the tenant to pay compensation (if appropriate). 

1. Give the tenant reasonable time to comply. 

Only if the tenant fails to comply may the landlord proceed to forfeit. 

Waiver of the Right to Forfeit

If, after becoming aware of a breach, the landlord does anything to affirm the lease (such as demanding or accepting rent after the breach), the right to forfeit for that breach may be lost. 

Key points about waiver: 

• It must be done with knowledge of the breach. 

• It must recognise the continued existence of the lease. 

• Once waived, the landlord cannot later forfeit for that same breach (though future breaches may give rise to new rights). 

Because of this, landlords must take care not to inadvertently waive their rights. 

Relief from Forfeiture 

Even after forfeiture, tenants may apply to the court for relief from forfeiture. 

If granted, relief reinstates the lease as if forfeiture had never occurred, usually on terms that: 

• All arrears are paid, 

• The breach is remedied, and 

• The landlord’s costs are covered. 

For rent arrears, courts are generally sympathetic if the tenant can promptly pay. For serious breaches (e.g., unlawful alterations or illegal use), relief is less certain. 

Relief reflects the equitable nature of forfeiture: courts recognise it as a drastic remedy and aim to prevent disproportionate outcomes. 

Commercial and Practical Considerations 

For Landlords 

• Ensure the lease contains a clear forfeiture clause. 

• Act promptly after a breach. 

• Avoid waiver. 

• Carefully consider whether forfeiture is commercially sensible (e.g., in a weak rental market, regaining possession may not be advantageous). 

For Tenants 

• Act quickly upon receiving a Section 146 notice. 

• Seek legal advice immediately. 

• Apply for relief without delay if forfeiture occurs. 

• If you are aware that you are in financial difficulty make contact with your landlord to discuss payment options 

Alternatives to Forfeiture 

Landlords may also consider: 

• Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) (in England and Wales), 

• Debt recovery proceedings, 

• Drawing on rent deposits, 

• Serving statutory demands (subject to insolvency risks), 

• Negotiated settlements. 

Forfeiture should often be a last resort, given its legal and financial implications. 

Conclusion 

Forfeiture is a powerful but carefully controlled remedy in commercial leasing. While it enables landlords to protect their interests when tenants breach their obligations, strict procedural rules apply—particularly under statutes such as the Law of Property Act 1925. 

Both landlords and tenants should approach forfeiture with caution. For landlords, improper use can invalidate the termination and expose them to liability. For tenants, swift action may preserve valuable business premises through relief from forfeiture.